From:  stone5150
|
On: 2008/10/18 07:52:26
|
I got suspended from TOS for a couple of days for calling ScottPletcher a fuckhead. He got suspended too but it took dozens of slams on me in several threads. Also DanRollins narced on me, probably on Scott's behalf.
What is with certain words that get you into trouble more so than actual content and intent of words?
|
|
|
From: Hooligan
|
On: 2008/10/18 08:22:49
|
|
use of sexual swear words
|
|
|
From: JOK
|
On: 2008/10/18 09:56:17
|
|
why are their taboo words about sex acts but not for violence and murder?
|
|
|
From: JOK
|
On: 2008/10/18 09:57:08
|
|
copulating cranium might've been okay
|
|
|
From: Pino Carafa
|
On: 2008/10/18 10:22:37
|
|
Anal retention. Some people think that they can keep things "civil" by banning a few "bad" words from some idiotic list.
|
|
|
From: stone5150
|
On: 2008/10/18 10:31:11
|
I think Pino hit it on the proverbial head.
Also, why is sex bad but violence is perfectly OK?
|
|
|
From: stone5150
|
On: 2008/10/18 12:24:09
|
Scott is a fucking dumbass rethuglican that can't shit without first finding out what Fox News says about the proper way to do it.
Dan is just a little fucking weasel that needs a good ass whipping. Fucking little narc motherfucker.
There, got that shit out of my system.
|
|
|
From: shekerra
|
On: 2008/10/18 14:44:33
|
I never really liked Dan's online profile - I always assumed he was a drunk asshat and I never knew scott. Of course I always thought you were a redneck who smoked ciggies too - so I could be wrong! I do not put much to do in online bullies (as you know by now) and neither should you.
One thing I do know is that if you hold grudges Bob - it is only going to make it worse for your health in the long run. The world does not revolve around EE but around your life and family.
Just chill out and smile - you will perhaps get a lot of stuff done with this time off then you could have got done while zone editing.
Cheers!
/Shrek :P~
|
|
|
From: stone5150
|
On: 2008/10/18 17:01:07
|
I smoke ciggies, but I am not a redneck, though I do like to make fun of them often enough that I could see where the confusion on that came from.
I don't hold grudges, but I get a bit pissy about things sometimes and need to vent.
|
|
|
From: shekerra
|
On: 2008/10/18 17:17:03
|
|
ahhh - we haven't had a good rant for quite sometime - please carry on :)
|
|
|
From: Pino Carafa
|
On: 2008/10/19 05:12:20
|
|
Indeed. And nobody's going to tell you off for using a bad word or two. Not HERE they aren't.
|
|
|
From: shekerra
|
On: 2008/10/19 06:25:42
|
bad word
two
|
|
|
From: stone5150
|
On: 2008/10/19 06:41:57
|
|
bad word, bad word, whatcha gonna do, whatcha gonna do when they come for you? Bad word, bad word
|
|
|
From: syscokid
|
On: 2008/10/19 09:38:21
|
Calling ScottPletcher a fuckhead is like saying the sky is blue.
It seems PeeStreet has changed the rules again over there. If you had said, "ScottPletcher, you have the ideas of a fuckhead" it would be okay.
![[smile]](http://www.carobit.com/Forum/images/sm/smile.jpg)
|
|
|
From: stone5150
|
On: 2008/10/19 11:45:12
|
ScottPletcher has the ideas of a motherfucking stupid fuckhead, has the bacteria that makes him smell of rancid dog shit and has cranial material of the consistency of runny diarrhea.
Is that acceptable?
|
|
|
From: Pino Carafa
|
On: 2008/10/19 11:50:10
|
ROTFLMAO.
It is here. Or you could just say "ScottPletcher is a cunt". Works for me.
|
|
|
From: Baldrick
|
On: 2008/10/22 04:25:37
|
http://www.expe...m/Other/Politics/Q_23809954.html
Words fail me to describe that Pletcher half-wit
|
|
|
From: shekerra
|
On: 2008/10/22 05:14:41
|
LOL and to think that he got away with posting this:
"You are an immoral scum, that's for sure." That is equivalent to a *curse word* by my thinking...
"PeeStreet has changed the rules again over there."
Par for the course - the first time I went over to P&R (not my first post over yonder but it was my first SERIOUS Q.) he attacked me! Then we had to work it all out via email and mods - sheesh it was like a mini world war.
|
|
|
From: stone5150
|
On: 2008/10/22 07:22:05
|
You have probably woke him up.
Lets hope he attacks you again. Not that I want to see you attacked, I just want him to get smacked down again.
|
|
|
From: shekerra
|
On: 2008/10/22 08:22:32
|
|
LOL I think I might be in the mood to do a bit of smacking down - first time in a very long time!
|
|
|
From: Pino Carafa
|
On: 2008/10/22 14:05:52
|
|
That's the problem over yonder: they think it is perfectly OK to say the most atrocious things about other people if you stay "polite" about it, although you're right - "scum" is hardly a nice word now, is it? But anyway. It's ridiculous.
|
|
|
From: stone5150
|
On: 2008/10/22 14:53:25
|
Scum is only the tip of the iceberg
You are an immoral scum, that's for sure.
Once again the bizarre and idiotic attempt at moral equivalence...
We're already in WWIII, you're just too willingly blind to accept it. Another "useful idiot" -- or full-blown supporter -- of jihadists.
you're inane
You're the only idiot in the country that thinks...
Even as morally obtuse as you are,...
I know leftists are by nature morally stunted but that's still shocking.
You're the huge hypocrite...
Plus many more
|
|
|
From: Pino Carafa
|
On: 2008/10/22 14:58:25
|
|
You see, what you do not understand is that it is WAY too difficult for their moderators to try and understand the content, the meaning, the essence, the intention of a message. It is MUCH easier to match a message against The List Of Forbidden Words, and simply go "If Contains [NaughtyWord] Then Slap Poster". That just requires blind following of a simple rule, and does not involve any intelligence. And that does appeal to certain people. And then when it all goes horribly wrong they can hide behind "I was only doing my job". Ah. How nice it is to be able to lead a life where one can offload all responsibility to other people.
|
|
|
From: shekerra
|
On: 2008/10/22 15:02:29
|
|
I wonder if I use words like hsit and csum and such if scott get me expelled too? I might just visit that TA soon because I could use a short vacation so that I can catch up on my blogs!
|
|
|
From: stone5150
|
On: 2008/10/22 15:13:54
|
You should go tell that little petty fucking cocksucker off, god I hate that little fuckwad.
You know that he would be a little panty pissing pussy in a face to face convo but he has balls of steel on the internets.
|
|
|
From: shekerra
|
On: 2008/10/22 15:22:00
|
|
lol - I can't exactly tell him off or anything like that until he attacks me :)
|
|
|
From: stone5150
|
On: 2008/10/22 15:36:34
|
|
It wouldn't be so bad if he actually argued, but all he does is parrot a bunch of horseshit from the likes of the Great Frozen Retard aka Bible Spice.
|
|
|
From: shekerra
|
On: 2008/10/22 15:44:37
|
>Great Frozen Retard aka Bible Spice.
I'm dying here - LOL!
|
|
|
From: Baldrick
|
On: 2008/10/23 01:40:54
|
Can you imagine what Scott must've been like at school?
Jeez, he must've had his head flushed down the toilet every day for five years, for being such an smarmy obnoxious twunt.
Actually, that would explain a lot.
|
|
|
From: shekerra
|
On: 2008/10/23 02:02:29
|
|
alright baldrick, am missing your current email - fess up via carobit mail or YIM or ? x0x0x
|
|
|
From: stone5150
|
On: 2008/10/23 07:58:05
|
|
Are you implying that maybe Scott has water, like from the toilet, on the brain?
|
|
|
From: Hooligan
|
On: 2008/10/23 10:15:23
|
|
I've been studying Scott Peltcher, he seems to be good at causing gross offense. I wonder if he believes what he writes, like does he really 100% believe that global warming is false?
|
|
|
From: stone5150
|
On: 2008/10/23 10:20:19
|
|
No one with any sense could believe that is 100% false, I can see people doubting that it is 100% true, but believing it to be 100% false takes a special kind of obtuseness.
|
|
|
From: Baldrick
|
On: 2008/10/27 03:16:16
|
|
LOL. That probably makes you a communist and a terrorist sympathiser, according to Scott. What a cocoa shunter.
|
|
|
From: Hooligan
|
On: 2008/10/27 05:54:22
|
Scott Pletcher is a clever guy, he seems to be able to manipulate language such that it is hard to refute his arguments without resorting to much longer passages of reasoning. So its as if he's landing quick punches all over the place, but ultimately it doesn't mean he's right, at least I hope he isn't.
|
|
|
From: stone5150
|
On: 2008/10/27 06:05:06
|
|
That is their strength, him and his ilk post bullshit that has a tiny grain of truth to it, some of which is backed up by sites full of that sort of bullshit. If you post a link to a site that takes the time to check all the facts they call them "in the tank" or "leftist" or some such meaningless crap.
|
|
|
From: Pino Carafa
|
On: 2008/10/28 08:57:07
|
|
I wonder what was offensive about my Atheist Bus thread on EE? But somebody deleted it :-)
|
|
|
From: stone5150
|
On: 2008/10/28 09:09:41
|
|
Someone either is anti-Atheist or anti-public transportation.
|
|
|
From: Pino Carafa
|
On: 2008/10/29 05:20:14
|
Apparently there wasn't a real "question" in my question, if you catch my drift.
Which, of course, is bullshit. Anyway (shrug)
|
|
|
From: shekerra
|
On: 2010/01/06 20:46:37
|
|
Well it is your 11th birfday so go get your poinks and kudos over at TOS http://www.expe...Lounge/Q_25022466.html#a26196891
|
|
|
From: stone5150
|
On: 2010/01/07 01:59:31
|
|
I almost forgot
|
|
